Uttar Pradesh news: The court had asked the district administration to make the necessary arrangements within the next seven days in Varanasi.
In an earlier order on January 17, the Varanasi court had directed that the district magistrate should take charge of the cellar. But it had not then given any directions on the right to offer prayers there.
While the VHP welcomed the order, Muslim side counsel Mumtaz Ahmed said they will challenge it in the high court.
The Varanasi court verdict also authorised Hindu prayers at 'Vyas Ka Tekhana,' with the district administration directed to facilitate arrangements within seven days. The ruling promoted religious inclusivity, fostering the coexistence of both communities.
Gyanvapi case: The Varanasi court verdict also authorised Hindu prayers at 'Vyas Ka Tekhana,' with the district administration directed to facilitate arrangements within seven days. The ruling promoted religious inclusivity, fostering the coexistence of both communities.
Gyanvapi mosque case: Qasim Rasool Ilyas alleged that the Hindu side tried its best to create unrest in the society months before when the survey team, in its report, had described the fountain present in the reservoir as a 'Shivling'.
India's number one and most followed Super Prime Time News Show, ‘Aaj Ki Baat-Rajat Sharma Ke Saath' was launched just before the 2014 general elections.
Eleven people, including from both the Hindu and Muslim side, applied for copies of the ASI survey report on the Gyanvapi mosque complex adjoining the Kashi Vishwanath temple, counsel for the Hindu litigants said.
The court has directed ASI to provide a hard copy of its survey report to both Hindu and Muslim sides.
Crucially, the mosque's "wazukhana," a small reservoir utilized for ritual ablutions, was explicitly excluded from the survey. This decision aligns with an earlier Supreme Court order safeguarding the specific spot within the mosque complex where Hindu litigants claim a 'Shivling' structure exists.
The survey, mandated by the Varanasi district court, excludes the "wazukhana," a reservoir for ritual ablutions, within the mosque complex. A prior Supreme Court ruling protected this particular spot from being included in the survey.
The ASI had presented its survey report in a sealed cover to the Varanasi district court on December 18. The ASI started the survey in the barricaded area of the Gyanvapi premises, excluding its sealed section, on August 4.
Gyanvapi Mosque case: The AIMC, which looks after the management of Gyanvapi mosque located adjacent to Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, has challenged the maintainability of a suit filed before a Varanasi court, wherein the Hindu petitioners have sought restoration of a temple at the site.
The court had ordered to conduct a survey after the petitioners claimed the mosque was constructed over a pre-existing temple. Four senior officials of the ASI were also present in the court when the report was submitted.
The court fixed December 18 as the next date of hearing in the matter.
The ASI started the survey in the barricaded area of the Gyanvapi premises, excluding its sealed section, on August 4, following court orders to determine whether the 17th-century mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple.
While hearing the matter last week, District Judge AK Vishvesh asked the ASI to submit its report by November 28. The ASI has carried out a thorough survey of the Gyanvapi premises.
ASI has completed the survey, which continued for over 100 days. The court had initially directed the ASI to submit the report in September but the latter sought extension stating that the work was unfinished. The court then directed the ASI to submit the report by November 17.
Gyanvapi case: The ASI is carrying out a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, next to the Kashi Vishwanath Temple, to determine whether the 17th-century mosque was constructed over a pre-existing temple.
Gyanvapi case: The Varanasi court had earlier granted additional time to the ASI for the completion of the scientific survey of the mosque by November 17. The ASI survey began in July when the Allahabad HC said that step is "necessary in the interest of justice".
Top News
Latest News
