A Delhi court on Thursday granted bail to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a money laundering case stemming from the alleged excise scam. Special Judge Niyay Bindu granted the relief to the AAP leader on a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh.
Delhi High Court ordered the removal of tweets by Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Jairam Ramesh, and Pawan Khera alleging that journalist Rajat Sharma abused Nayak on live-television.
Kumar's judicial custody was ending today as he was sent to judicial custody on June 1 for 14 days. Bibhav Kumar has also moved to the High Court seeking regular bail after his two bail applications were dismissed by the Tis Hazari Court.
In the video, Arvind Kejriwal, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convenor, is seen addressing a trial court. The matter has been listed for further hearing on July 9.
Delhi's Tis Hazari Court had denied Bibhav Kumar bail in the Swati Maliwal assault case. He has moved Delhi High Court seeking a regular bail in the matter.
Arvind Kejriwal had sought extension of his interim bail by seven days to undergo a host of medical tests, including a PET-CT scan, in view of "sudden and unexplained weight loss coupled with high ketone levels", which are indicative of kidney, serious cardiac ailments and even cancer.
In a statement, veteran actor Jackie Shroff thanked Delhi High Court and also expressed his gratitude to the judiciary for passing an order that safeguards his personality rights including his name, image, voice and other unique attributes.
The CBI and ED opposed the bail plea, citing concerns about potential tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses. They presented detailed arguments outlining Kavitha's alleged role in the excise policy case, stressing the need for her continued custody to ensure a fair investigation.
Delhi High Court passed an order protecting the personality and publicity rights of veteran Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff. More details about the case below.
Recently, Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff moved to Delhi High Court seeking protection of his personality and publicity rights. This is not the first time that a Bollywood actor has sought help from the court for privacy and publicity rights. Know why these stars are doing this suddenly?
The petitioner's case challenged the Delhi High Court's earlier decision, which similarly denied termination based on the absence of foetal abnormalities and the lack of threat to the mother's health.
Despite only 17 arrests made thus far, the court has been inundated with over 250 bail petitions, highlighting the complexity and scope of the case. The Enforcement Directorate emphasised the burden on the investigation officer, who is required to attend court proceedings nearly every day.
The plea alleged that no action has been taken against Prime Minister Modi and others from the BJP for their alleged hate speeches, despite complaints made to the ECI.
Delhi excise policy scam case: BRS leader K Kavitha had cited hypertension as a reason for bail, stressing the need for medical care after her arrest by the Enforcement Directorate.
The Delhi High Court, on a plea moved by Rajat Sharma against non-regulation of deepfake technology, asked the union government if it was willing to act in this matter. The petition raises an important issue relating to deepfakes, the non-regulation of deepfakes and its dire consequences.
Previously, on April 1, the court had directed the DDA to provide details regarding its proposal for forest development, underscoring the sustainability of the chosen land for forest creation.
Delhi excise policy scam case: Sisodia was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation on February 26, 2023, for his alleged role in the scam. The Enforcement Directorate arrested Sisodia in a money-laundering case stemming from the CBI FIR on March 9, 2023.
The Delhi High Court's observations came days after it made sharp remarks on Kejriwal that the Delhi government was “interested in appropriation of power” as Kejriwal's continuation in the office of the chief minister even after his arrest puts political interest over national interest.
The High Court bench dismissed the plea saying that it is devoid of any merit and that the judiciary cannot ask the poll body to take a particular view of any complaint.
The Delhi High Court observed that the Delhi government was "interested in appropriation of power". The court made sharp observations while hearing a PIL highlighting the non-supply of educational material and other statutory benefits to students in the MCD schools.
Top News
Latest News
