Cyrus Mistry was the sixth and the youngest at the age of 44 years to become the Chairman of Tata Sons when he took over in 2012 from Ratan Tata.
Cyrus Mistry's death: Anahita Pandole (55), a well-known gynaecologist, and her husband Darius Pandole (60) survived the crash, while Mistry (54) and Jahangir Pandole, brother of Darius, were killed in the accident, which occurred around 3 pm, about 120 km from Mumbai.
Who is Cyrus Mistry? A south Mumbai low-profile boy, 44-year-old Mistry family scion was already heading companies in the Shapoorji Pallonji Group when he was appointed to succeed Ratan Tata as the head of the over USD 100 billion, salt-to-software Tata group.
Cyrus Mistry dies in road accident: Mistry had taken over as the chairman of Tata Sons in December 2012 after Ratan Tata announced his retirement. Netizens took to Twitter and condoled the death of Mistry.
Cyrus Mistry killed in road accident: Fadnavis said he was shocked and deeply pained to know about the demise of Mistry (54) in the unfortunate accident near Palghar adjoining Mumbai.
Cyrus Mistry death: Several people expressed their condolences to the death of former Tata Sons chairman, Cyrus Mistry.
Cyrus Mistry was not alone in the luxury car. Four people were present when the accident happened. Two of them were confirmed dead on spot.
Cyrus Mistry dies in car accident: Mistry was traveling from Ahmedabad to Mumbai when his car hit the divider. There were four people in the car out of which two succumbed to injuries. The other two have been admitted to a local hospital in Kasa.
A bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana, however, ordered the deletion of certain remarks made against Cyrus Mistry in the March 2021 verdict.
A three-judge bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice AS Bopanna, and Justice V Ramasubramanian said the petitions will be heard in open court on March 9.
Supreme Court had on March 26 set aside the NCLAT order of December 18, 2019 restoring Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata Group.
Tata Trusts, which owns 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons, is chaired by Ratan Tata, the patriarch of the Tata group, while the Mistry family owns 18.4 per cent stake in the company.
Tata, Cyrus Mistry case verdict update: A bitter legal erupted between Tata and Cysrus Mistry after the latter was removed from Tata Sons’ board as chairman in October 2016.
Supreme Court on Friday stayed the NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) order restoring Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata group. Last week, Cyrus Mistry announced that he is not interested in getting back to the Tata Group at any cost.
The Supreme Court will hear on January 10 the petition by Tata Sons Private Ltd (TSPL) challenging the NCLAT decision restoring Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of the Tata group.
Tata Sons Private Limited (TSPL) is likely to mention in the Supreme Court on Monday its petition challenging the NCLAT decision restoring Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the group and saying the verdict "undermined corporate democracy" and the "rights" of its board of directors. A lawyer associated with the matter said the petition would be mentioned for urgent hearing.
Cyrus Mistry on Sunday said he is not interested in getting back to the Tata Group in any capacity at all, ahead of the Supreme Court's hearing on an urgent petition seeking to set aside the NCLAT order reinstalling him as the group chairman and also in the board of group companies.
Ratan Tata on Friday filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to quash a company law appellate court order directing Tata Sons to rehire the chairman it had fired in 2016, saying the judgment was "wrong, erroneous and contrary to the record of the case".
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order issued on December 18 directed the conglomerate to reappoint Cyrus Mistry as chairman of Tata Sons and three group companies – TCS, Tata Industries and Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra).
Tata Sons on Wednesday said it will take appropriate legal recourse against the NCLAT judgement to reinstate ousted Chairman Cyrus Mistry, while stating it was not clear how the order sought to over-rule decisions taken by its shareholders and those of listed group firms at 'validly constituted shareholder meetings'.
Top News
Latest News
