Supreme Court of India has advanced the date of completion of arguments in Ayodhya dispute and has asked all parties to complete arguments by tomorrow (October 16)
Section 144 has been imposed in Ayodhya District by the District Magistrate in anticipation of Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute verdict. Section 144 will be in effect till December 10.
The Supreme Court Tuesday asked the counsels for both Hindu and Muslim parties in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case to inform it about the tentative "time schedule" for concluding their arguments.
The students union of the Presidency University on Sunday alleged that an official of the institute has asked it to stop screening of 'Ram ke Naam', a 1992 documentary film based on the Babri Masjid demolition.
A bench of justices R F Nariman and Surya Kant said a fresh letter has been written by the special judge on July 27 in which he had made five requests including providing him security.
Tucy said on Sunday that if the Supreme Court hands him over the land, he will donate the entire land for building the Ram temple as he respects their sentiments and the belief that a Ram temple stood at the place where Babri Masjid was built.
The three-member mediation panel had submitted a status report earlier this month. A fresh status report will be filed in Supreme Court on Thursday (August 1). The status report will be filed in a sealed envelope.
The three-member mediation panel constituted to find amicable solution to Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute is due to submit its report in Supreme Court today. One of the main litigants, Iqbal Ansari said that more time should be granted to mediation panel for n effective solutiuon. But Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas is against further delay.
"We do not regret but are proud of demolishing the Babri Masjid. We removed the waste from our Lord Ram's temple," she said in a TV interview.
Five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court today said there will be no hearing in the case for the day, only the date and schedule will be decided
Ayodhya case: Delay in Ram Temple construction making Hindus anxious
Five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court today said there will be no hearing in the case for the day, only the date and schedule will be decided
Five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court today said there will be no hearing in the case for the day, only the date and schedule will be decided
The move comes ahead of the January 4 hearing by the apex court on the matter.
When Babar demolished Ram mandir in Ayodhya he didn't followed any law, says Anil Vij
Many historians say that when the Babur's army entered Ayodhya, scores of unarmed Hindus were guarding the temple. They fought bravely against the large number of armed troops for 15 days.
Before the crucial verdict, let's have a look at the original judgement in the Ismail Faruqi case and how it can affect Ayodhya dispute:
During the hearing, Uttar Pradesh Shia Waqf Board chairman, Waseem Rizvi said that there was never a Masjid on that site in Ayodhya and there can never be a Masjid there.
Shia community bats for Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, will support Modi in 2019 Lok Sabha elections
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer said this as a number of applicants including the resident of Ayodhya and Faizabad urged to court to ask parties to the dispute.
Top News
Latest News
