In a remark that has now sparked a controversy, former pacer Rodney Hogg has said that Australia’s best-ever sportsman, Don Bradman, would not have been as successful now as he was in his playing days.
Bradman holds a special place in the hearts of all Australian sports fans and is regarded as the best cricketer ever.
Hogg said Bradman wouldn’t have averaged his famous 99.94 if he was playing today. “It’s disrespectful, but those stats jumped at me that it was easier to bat between 1920 and 1950, than what it is now,” Hogg told ‘SEN Radio’.
“Sir Donald Bradman was a freak, but I don’t think he would have averaged 99 now.”
Hogg, who represented Australia in the late 70’s and 80’s, used batting averages throughout different periods of history as a guide, pointing out the number of averages above 50 for batsmen playing for England in comparison to the modern era.
“(It’s) just very interesting the batting averages England have had in current times, Graham Gooch has got 42, (David) Gower has got about 43, (Allan) Lamb is mid to low 40s, Geoffrey Boycott’s 47, (Kevin) Pietersen 47,” Hogg said.
“I’ll go back between 1920 and 1950, (Walter) Hammond averaged 58, (Herbert) Sutcliffe 60, (Len) Hutton 56 and (Jack) Hobbs 56, so there’s four names I’ve just come up with, who’ve all got averages above all the current-time players.
“I’m saying now that I don’t think Sir Donald Bradman in this current era would’ve averaged anywhere near 99.94, I’m saying it based on that (those averages).”
Hogg’s comments caused a stir on Twitter as fans expressed their opinions slamming the pacer.
(With inputs from PTI)
