Sunday, December 22, 2024
Advertisement
  1. You Are At:
  2. News
  3. Politics
  4. National
  5. Priyanka Gandhi's clarification on her land deals raises more questions, says Law Minister

Priyanka Gandhi's clarification on her land deals raises more questions, says Law Minister

Rejecting Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s public clarification over her land deals, Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Friday said that it raises more questions than it answers.

India TV Politics Desk New Delhi Published : Apr 29, 2017 8:26 IST, Updated : Apr 29, 2017 8:34 IST
Priyanka Gandhi, Robert Vadra
Priyanka Gandhi and Robert Vadra

Rejecting Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s public clarification over her land deals, Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Friday said that it raises more questions than it answers.

Prasad further claimed that there is a "similar pattern" in the land deals of Priyanka and her husband Robert Vadra.

"Only one inference can be drawn from Priyanka's statement -- perhaps she was advised this is too hot a potato to be handled and, therefore, her transactions must be segregated and a clarification issued," Prasad said while speaking with TimesNow channel.

"... her clarification raises more questions than it answers," he added. 

Priyanka said on Thursday that agricultural land bought by her in Haryana's Faridabad district or other property acquired by her had no links to the finances of her husband, his Skylight Hospitality, or reality major DLF.

A report in the Economic Times on Thursday said the S.N. Dhingra Commission appointed by the Haryana government is said to have concluded that Vadra made "unlawful profits" of Rs 50.5 crore from a land deal in Haryana in 2008 without spending a single paisa.

Prasad said "certain patterns" are similar in the land deals of both Priyanka and Robert Vadra.

"One, the land is transferred back to the vendor in both cases; and secondly, the appreciation of the land is enormous". 

"Given the influence Robert Vadra exercised with the then (Bhupinder Singh Hooda) government and the speedy manner in which land use was changed after bypassing norms, it can be inferred that it was designed to allow a situation of windfall gains," Prasad said. 

On te Congress objection that no notice was sent by the commission to either Robert Vadra or Hooda, Prasad said Justice S.N. Dhingra (retd) must have followed the procedure.

 

"Justice Dhingra is a seasoned and celebrated judge. His knowledge of law is wholesome. Let's assume he sent notices but they were not answered. The larger issue is: don't go into procedure, but come to propriety. Don't go into semantics, but reply on substance," Prasad, a senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader, said.

(With IANS inputs)

Advertisement

Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from Politics and National Section

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement