Thursday, December 19, 2024
Advertisement
  1. You Are At:
  2. News
  3. Politics
  4. National
  5. Delhi HC scraps Kejriwal’s plea seeking Arun Jaitley’s financial records

Delhi HC scraps Kejriwal’s plea seeking Arun Jaitley’s financial records

The Delhi High Court today rejected Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea to disclose the bank accounts and financial records of the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and family. The High Court said that Kejriwal's plea,

India TV Politics Desk New Delhi Published : Mar 01, 2017 17:39 IST, Updated : Mar 01, 2017 17:39 IST
Delhi HC, Arvind Kejriwal, Arun Jaitley
Image Source : PTI Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court today rejected Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea to disclose the bank accounts and financial records of the Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and family.

The High Court said that Kejriwal's plea, which also sought the bank statements of Jaitley's family members and companies in which he or they had over 10 per cent shareholding, was a "fishing or roving enquiry" and did not have any merit.

Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw also dismissed Kejriwal's plea seeking removal of certain portions of Jaitley's evidence claiming they were not there in the pleadings and replication of the BJP leader.

Advocate Anupam Srivastava, appearing for Kejriwal, said they intended to appeal against the order.

Jaitley had filed a defamation suit in 2015 seeking Rs. 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and other AAP leaders Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai.

The AAP leaders had allegedly attacked Jaitley and his family members in various fora, including social media, over alleged irregularities and financial bungling in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA), of which he was the president for about 13 years till 2013.

Jaitley has already denied all the allegations.

While Kejriwal's pleas were dismissed, Aam Aadmi Party spokesperson Raghav Chadha's application for framing of an additional issue, that statements made by him in public fora against a public figure are privileged from defamatory action, was allowed by the court.

It, however, did not frame the additional issue whether the plaintiff (Jaitley) has to prove that alleged defamatory statements were made out of malice, after senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Pratibha M Singh, appearing for the BJP leader, objected to it.

The court also allowed his plea for filing original annual reports and statements of accounts of DDCA for the period from 2000-01 to 2012-13.

(With inputs from PTI)

Advertisement

Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from Politics and National Section

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement