Friday, December 27, 2024
Advertisement
  1. You Are At:
  2. News
  3. Politics
  4. National
  5. Defending Article 35-A not confined to one region, religion anymore: Mehbooba Mufti

Defending Article 35-A not confined to one region, religion anymore: Mehbooba Mufti

She was referring to the reports of two of BJP MLAs from Jammu region coming out in support of Article 35-A, which is facing a legal challenge in the Supreme Court.

Edited by: India TV Politics Desk Srinagar Published : Aug 11, 2018 16:41 IST, Updated : Aug 11, 2018 16:44 IST
Mehbooba Mufti File Image

Mehbooba Mufti File Image

Defending the special status of Jammu and Kashmir is not confined to a particular region or religion anymore as the people of the state have realised its importance and sanctity, former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti said on Saturday while referring to the reports of two BJP MLAs coming out in support of Article 35-A, which is facing a legal challenge in the Supreme Court. 

"Heartening to know that two MLAs from BJP, Rajesh Gupta followed by Dr Gagan (Bhagat), have raised their voice in defence of Article 35-A. Defending the special status of J-K is not confined to a region or religion anymore. People of the state have realised its importance & (and) sanctity," Mehbooba wrote on twitter.

Stating that her government fought the case legally in the apex court, Mehbooba said she  "stood alone" in the political battle emphasising that any dilution of Article 35-A would set the state on fire.

"Today I feel relieved that regardless of political views or affiliations, we are all on the same page as far as protecting the special status of J-K is concerned," Mehbooba wrote. 

The Supreme Court had, on August 6, said that a three-judge bench would decide whether the pleas challenging Article 35-A should be referred to a five-judge Constitution bench for examining the larger issue of alleged violation of the doctrine of basic structure of the Constitution.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A Khanwilkar had adjourned the crucial hearing on as many as five petitions "to the week commencing from August 27" on the grounds that they pertained to the challenge to a Constitutional scheme and could not be heard as the third judge, Justice D Y Chandrachud, was not present on that day. 

(With PTI inputs)

Advertisement

Read all the Breaking News Live on indiatvnews.com and Get Latest English News & Updates from Politics and National Section

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement