The Supreme Court on Tuesday (August 20) set aside a Calcutta High Court order that acquitted an accused in a sexual-assault case and made “objectionable” remarks in which it advised adolescent girls to “control sexual urges”. The top court termed these observations as “shocking” and perverse.
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan restored the conviction of the accused for rape and sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and said that his sentence will, however, depend on the report of an expert committee to be constituted by the West Bengal government for interacting with the victim, who is now married to the accused and residing with him with her minor daughter.
The top court said that a judge has to decide a case and not preach and his or her personal opinion cannot be made a part of a judgment.
"The high court went to the extent of observing that the case of criminalisation of a romantic relationship between two adolescents of opposite sex should be best left to the wisdom of the judiciary. The courts must follow and implement the law. The courts cannot commit violence against the law," the bench said.
"We need not waste pages dealing with every observation or finding quoted above. The observations are utterly irrelevant for deciding the controversy. To say the least, these observations are shocking, which will ex-facie invite a finding of perversity," the bench said in its 50-page verdict.
The top court said it is the responsibility of the State to take care of the helpless victims of such heinous offences and time and again, the court has held that the right to live a dignified life is an integral part of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The child, who is the victim of offences under the POCSO Act, is also deprived of the fundamental right to live a dignified and healthy life, the bench said and added that immediately after the knowledge of the commission of a heinous offence under the Act, the State, its agencies and instrumentalities must step in and render all possible aid to the victim.
"Unfortunately, in our society, due to whatever reasons, we find that there are cases where the parents of the victims of offences under the POSCO Act abandon the victims. In such a case, it is the duty of the State to provide shelter, food, clothing, education opportunities etc. to the victims of the offences as provided in law," it said.
The bench added that even a child born to such a victim needs to be taken care of in a similar manner by the State.
"Sadly, in the present case, there is a complete failure of the state machinery. Nobody came to rescue the victim of the offence, and thus, for her survival, no option was left to her but to seek shelter with the accused," the bench said.
It further said "the importance of rehabilitation of the victims of offences under the POCSO Act, which is a mandatory requirement of law, is being overlooked by all stakeholders. Perhaps, at levels, there is a need for introspection and course correction. We include even the judiciary in that".
It directed the West Bengal government to constitute a committee of three experts, including a clinical psychologist and a social scientist, within three weeks for interacting with the victim at such a place as it desires to communicate what the state government is offering to her.
"The committee must also inform the victim about the availability of the benefits of the scheme of the Government of India. The duty of the committee shall be to help the victim to make an informed choice -- whether she wants to continue to remain in the company of the accused and his family or wants to avail of the benefits offered by the state government," the bench directed.
It said the committee shall submit a report in a sealed cover to the court by October 18, containing the details of the interactions with the victim and its own opinions and recommendations.
The high court acquitted the man on October 18, 2023, saying it was a case of "non-exploitative consensual sexual relationship between two consenting adolescents, though consent in view of the age of the victim is immaterial".
(With PTI inputs)
ALSO READ | What were hospital authorities doing? Why delay in FIR?: SC raps Bengal govt, police | TOP QUOTES
