New Delhi, Sep 22: Asking Supreme Court not to entertain plea seeking probe against Home Minister P Chidambaram in 2G scam, the Centre today said it should not cross ‘Lakshman Rekha' by passing order but the apex court rejected the contention saying its not sacrosanct.
“You are referring to Lakshaman Rekha. If Sita had not crossed the Lakshaman Rekha then Ravana would not have been killed. Lakshaman Rekha was crossed and the demons were killed. Lakshaman Rekha is not so sacrosanct. People are fond of saying so,” a bench of justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly said.
The court's remark came after senior advocate P P Rao, appearing for the Centre, contended that monitoring jurisdiction of the apex court came to end after charge sheet was filed by the CBI in the 2G scam in April this year and the bench should not cross the Lakshaman Rekha by entertaining Janta Party President Subramanian Swamy plea against Chidambaram.
“It is well settled that the task of monitoring by the apex court would come to an end the moment the charge sheet was filed and thereafter ordinary process of law would take place,” Rao said adding that such petition is not maintainable in the apex court and Swamy should approach the Special CBI court which is holding the trial in the case.
The bench then questioned Rao on why the concept of court monitoring in cases has come into existence at all.
“Why this concept of monitoring at all. Till Vineet Narayan case(1996) there was no court monitoring. Why then it has become necessary now?,” the bench asked. Rao replied that it was a part of evolution of law and law evolves according to necessity.
The bench then said that it has evolved because of emerging corruption and lack of proper investigation by the agency in many cases.
“Court monitoring is because of widespread malice. Is it not so? These types of cases were not in past,” the bench said. PTI
