The Defence Ministry and Army, in their joint statement to the tribunal, had said Harsha's husband was not economically dependent on her and he cannot claim compensation.
They also contended that the jeep was on defence duty and the doctrine of sovereign immunity was applicable in the case and they were not liable to pay compensation for the incident.
The jeep driver also alleged that the petitioner was driving his car rashly and negligently and flouted traffic rules and regulations.
The tribunal, however, refused to accept their contention, saying the Supreme Court has held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity has no application so far as claims for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act are concerned.
