Ram Mandir construction work to start from June 10.
The long awaited Ram Mandir construction is set to commence from Wednesday (June 10) onwards in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The construction of the temple will begin after the 'Rudra Abhishek' ceremony which will be attended by a few people amid coronavirus outbreak in the country. Earlier in May, during the excavation process at the Ram Mandir site, several historical, ancient structures were found.
In a historic decision, the Supreme Court on November 9 last year directed the Central government to hand over the site at Ayodhya for the construction of a temple and set up a trust for the same. The apex court had further directed the government to give a suitable land measuring five acres to the Sunni Waqf Board.
Timeline of Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute in Ayodhya
The Ayodhya land dispute over Ram Mandir and Babri Masjid has one of India's longest land dispute which continued for decades. The dispute first began in 1990 and ended almost after two decades in 2019 after Supreme Court finally gave its decision. Here is the timeline of events unfolded.
1528 | During the reign of Babur, the first Mughal emperor, the old Hindu temple was demolished and a mosque was constructed at the same place in Ayodhya and named after Babur.
1853 | The first recorded communal clashes over the site date to this year.
1859 | The colonial British administration put a fence around the site, denominating separate areas of worship for Hindus and Muslims. That is how it stood for about 90 years.
1949 | December - Idols were placed inside the mosque, both sides to the dispute filed civil suits. The government locked the gates, saying the matter was sub judice and declared the area disputed. The civil suits were filed for ownership of the Plot no 583 of the area.
1961 | Case filed in Indian courts against the forceful occupation of the Babri Mosque and placing of idols within it.
1984 | The movement to build a temple at the site, which Hindus claimed was the birthplace of Lord Ram, gathered momentum when Hindu groups formed a committee to spearhead the construction of a temple at the Ramjanmabhoomi site.
1986 | A district judge ordered the gates of the mosque to be opened after 37 years and allowed Hindus to worship inside the "disputed structure." A Babri Mosque Action Committee was formed as Muslims protested the move to allow Hindu prayers at the site. The gates were opened in less than an hour after the court decision.
1989 | The clamour for building a Ram temple was growing. In February, VHP proclaimed that a Shila or a stone will be established for construction of the temple near the area. In November, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad laid foundations of a temple on land adjacent to the "disputed structure" in presence of Home Minister Sh Boota Singh and then Chief Minister Sh ND Tiwari. There were sporadic clashes in the country such as Bhagalpur in Bihar.
1990 | VP Singh became the Prime Minister of India with support from BJP that had won 58 seats in the election, a massive improvement from its last tally of two seats. The then BJP president Lal Krishna Advani took out a cross-country rath yatra to garner support for the move to build a Ram temple at the site. On October 23, he was arrested in Bihar during the yatra, following which BJP took back its support to the government.
Later Chandrashekhar became the Prime Minister of India with support of the Congress. On October 30, many were gunned down by the police on orders of the then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav, when they gathered in Ayodhya as participants of the rath yatra; their bodies were thrown in river Saryu.
1991 | Congress came to power at centre after election in 1991, while BJP became the major opposition party in the center and came to power in many states such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Kalyan Singh was elected as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh. State government acquired 2.77-acre land in the area and gave it on lease to RamJanmBhoomi Nyas Trust. The Allahabad High Court stopped any permanent construction activity in the area. Kalyan Singh publicly supported the movement while Central Government took no action to curb the increasing tensions. In spite of the High Court judgement, the disputed area was leveled.
1992 | Kalyan Singh took steps to support the movement such as making entry into area easier, promising no firing on Karsevaks, opposing the decision of the central government to send Central Police force in the area, etc. In July, several thousand Karsevaks assembled in the area and the work for the maintenance of temple began. This activity was stopped after the intervention of the prime minister. Meetings started between Babri Masjid Action Committee and VHP leaders in presence of the home minister. On 30 October, Dharam Sansad of VHP proclaimed in Delhi that the talks have failed and Karseva will presume from 6 December. The Central Government was considering the deployment of central police forces in the area and dissolution of state government but in the end, decided against it. The case was being heard in the Supreme Court which told that State Government is responsible for ensuring law and order in the area. The government was discussing it in Cabinet Committee meeting and Rashtriya Ekta Parishad. BJP boycotted the Parishad. The Allahabad High Court was hearing the matter of the legality of the structure of foundation laid in 1989.
1992 December 6 | The Babri Mosque was demolished by a gathering of near 200,000 Karsevaks. Communal riots across India followed.
1992 December 16 | - Ten days after the demolition, the Congress government at the Centre, headed by PV Narasimha Rao, set up a commission of inquiry under Justice Liberhan.
1993 | Three months after being constituted, the Liberhan Commission began investigations into who and what led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque.
2001 | Tensions rose on the anniversary of the demolition of the mosque as the VHP reaffirmed its resolve to build a temple at the site.
2003 | The court ordered a survey to find out whether a temple to Lord Ram existed on the site. In August, the survey presented evidence of a temple under the mosque. Muslim groups disputed the findings.
2003 | September - A court ruled that seven Hindu leaders, including some prominent BJP leaders, should stand trial for inciting the destruction of the Babri Mosque.
2004 | November - An Uttar Pradesh court ruled that an earlier order which exonerated LK Advani for his role in the destruction of the mosque should be reviewed.
2007 | The Supreme Court refused to admit a review petition on the Ayodhya dispute.
2009 | The Liberhan Commission, which was instituted ten days after the demolition of the Babri Mosque in 1992, submitted its report on 30 June — almost 17 years after it began its inquiry. Its contents were not made public.
2010 September 30 | The Allahabad High Court pronounced its verdict on four title suits relating to the Ayodhya dispute on 30 September 2010. Ayodhya land to be divided into three parts. ⅓ goes to Ram Lalla represented by Hindu Maha Sabha, ⅓ to Sunni Wakf Board, ⅓ goes to Nirmohi Akhara.
2010 December | The Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha and Sunni Waqf Board moved to the Supreme Court of India, challenging part of the Allahabad High Court’s verdict.
2011 May 9 | Supreme Court of India stayed the High Court order splitting the disputed site into three parts and said that status quo will remain. The two-judge bench of Supreme Court remarked that the High Court ruling was surprising as no party wanted a split of the site.
2017 December 5 | Supreme Court of India Full bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra and comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul Nazeer set 8 February 2018 as the date for final hearing on the case.
2018 April 6 | Supreme Court of India ruled against the immediate constitution of a larger bench to hear the case.
2018 July | Supreme Court set July 20 as next date of hearing
2018 July 20 | Supreme Court reserved order on plea for a larger bench to decide whether mosques are integral to Islam
2018 September | Mosques not integral to Islam, Supreme Court reiterated
2018 October 29 | Supreme Court directed to list Ram Mandir matter in January 2019
2019 January 29 | Centre moved Supreme Court to hand over 67 acres of Ayodhya land to its owners
2019 March | Supreme Court reserved order on court-appointed mediation for a permanent solution
2019 March | Supreme Court gave another chance for mediation on Ayodhya land dispute case to explore possible settlement
2019 May 10 | Supreme Court granted time till August 15 to three-member mediation committee to find a solution
2019 November 9 | The Supreme Court directed the Central government to hand over the site at Ayodhya for the construction of a temple and set up a trust for the same. The apex court had further directed the government to give a suitable land measuring five acres to the Sunni Waqf Board.
ALSO READ | Ram Mandir construction in Ayodhya to begin with Rudra Abhishek ceremony on June 10
ALSO READ | Religious places reopen in Uttar Pradesh but Kanpur has to wait
