During the cross examination of the victim's friend, the counsel for Mukesh contended before Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna that they were not involved in the gangrape and had neither beaten the youth nor had robbed them.
Vinay, another accused in the case, claimed that he was not in the bus that fateful night and was at a music function in South Delhi.
The victim's friend, a 28-year-old software engineer, refuted the contentions of Mukesh and Vinay, saying he had identified the bus and even the accused who were present in it that night.
“It is wrong to suggest that accused Mukesh was not sitting on the driver's seat when I entered the bus. I had already identified the accused who was sitting on the driver's seat at the time of my entering the bus.
“It is wrong to suggest that accused Vinay was not present inside the bus at the time of the incident,” the victim's friend said.
Mukesh along with five others, including a juvenile, had allegedly gangraped a girl in a moving bus here on the night of December 16, 2012.
The girl had later died of her injuries in a Singapore hospital on December 29.
During the proceedings, the counsel also claimed that Mukesh has nothing do with the present case and he was falsely implicated at the instance of Delhi police and also because he was the brother of the main accused Ram Singh, who was found dead in his prison cell on March 11.
The victim's friend, however, refuted Mukesh's contention and said, “It is wrong to suggest that Mukesh was shown to me by the police in the police station before Test Identification Parade (TIP) or for that reason I had identified him in the TIP...
“... or that the photographs of accused Mukesh were shown prior to the TIP or that I had framed him because he is brother of accused Ram Singh (dead) or that he was framed at the instance of the police or that Mukesh was the only person among the accused person who knew driving.”
