Missing children: SC pulls up Centre, states
New Delhi, Feb 5 : The Centre and several state governments today came in for sharp criticism by the Supreme Court for their failure to file status report on the issue of missing children with
New Delhi, Feb 5 : The Centre and several state governments today came in for sharp criticism by the Supreme Court for their failure to file status report on the issue of missing children with the bench saying that nobody seems to be concerned about them.
The apex court also came down heavily on the Chief Secretaries of Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu for their failure to comply with its order to be present before it today on the issue, observing that they are “playing the fool with the court” and threatened to issue non-bailable warrants against them.
The bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir gave last opportunity to the Centre and the states which have not filed their affidavits on the matter and posted it for further hearing on February 19.
“Nobody seems to be concerned about the missing children. This is the irony,” the bench also comprising justices A R Dave and Vikramajit Sen said when senior advocate H S Phoolka,
appearing for the NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan, stated that hundreds of children were going missing everyday. The bench was upset at the outset when it was told that
Chief Secretaries of Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu were not present despite its earlier order.
Out of the five states whose Chief Secretaries were asked to appear, only the Chief Secretaries of Goa and Orissa were present. “Why they are not present? Shall we issue non-bailable warrant? They are playing the fool with the court. They can't say they are indisposed. Don't play fools with this court.
There was a direction, they had to be present here,” the bench said when counsel for the Arunachal Pradesh Government sought exemption from personal appearance of its Chief Secretary. Similar remarks were made by the court for the non-appearance of the Chief Secretaries of Gujarat and Tamil
Nadu.
The NGO in its PIL had alleged that over 1.7 lakh children had gone missing in the country between January 2008 and January 2010, many of whom were kidnapped for trafficking in flesh trade and child labour. Quoting statistics including from National Crime Research Bureau, the NGO had said that during that period, 1,17,480
children had gone missing in 392 districts in the country and out of these, 41,546 were yet to be traced.
The apex court disagreed with the reason of the Gujarat government that the Chief Secretary was recently appointed and, therefore, he could not appear before it. “Whether he had taken charge recently, doesn't matter. The order is passed by this court and you are required,” the bench said.
It also took exception to the plea seeking exemption from personal appearance of the Chief Secretary of Tamil Nadu. “We will issue non-bailable warrant next time,” it said. “What do you think? We pass orders just for the sake of passing orders?,” the court asked.
The bench rejected the plea for personal exemption of the Chief Secretaries of these states, saying, “Inspite of our January 17 order, the said three officials have once again thought it fit to treat the matter with extreme casualness as if the order passed by this court has no meaning.”
The judges made it clear that they have to appear personally and not through their representatives. “As far as other states are concerned, we are giving them
last opportunity to file their status report,” the court said. The bench also took exception to the submission by the West Bengal government counsel that the status report has not been filed as there was no instruction.
“Why don't you wake up from your slumber? Why are you appearing in the matter?,” the court said while also taking strong exception to the failure of the Delhi government to file the status report on the issue. It noted that the Union Territories which are governed by the Centre were the biggest defaulters.
The court also said that there were two counsel for the Centre, including Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A S Chandhiok, but there seemed to be no coordination.
“The left hand doesn't know what is there in the right hand,” it said, adding, “You are the biggest defaulters. You have no concern with children's issues. Who is the person responsible? Shall we call him.” The ASG said whatever he has to say he will place that on record.
The apex court concluded today's hearing by asking the ASG to file appropriate status reports on behalf of Ministries of Women and Child Welfare, Social Welfare and Home Affairs.
The court noted that not only the Centre but also the Governments of Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand, West Bengal and Union Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, NCT of Delhi and Lakhshadweep have not filed their status reports.
The court had on January 17 directed the states which had failed to file their response earlier, to do so by February 5 while stating that if they failed to do so, then their Chief Secretaries would have to appear before it.
The apex court had on March 16, last year issued notices to the Centre, the states, the UTs directing them to file their response on the issue of missing children.
The apex court also came down heavily on the Chief Secretaries of Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu for their failure to comply with its order to be present before it today on the issue, observing that they are “playing the fool with the court” and threatened to issue non-bailable warrants against them.
The bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir gave last opportunity to the Centre and the states which have not filed their affidavits on the matter and posted it for further hearing on February 19.
“Nobody seems to be concerned about the missing children. This is the irony,” the bench also comprising justices A R Dave and Vikramajit Sen said when senior advocate H S Phoolka,
appearing for the NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan, stated that hundreds of children were going missing everyday. The bench was upset at the outset when it was told that
Chief Secretaries of Arunachal Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu were not present despite its earlier order.
Out of the five states whose Chief Secretaries were asked to appear, only the Chief Secretaries of Goa and Orissa were present. “Why they are not present? Shall we issue non-bailable warrant? They are playing the fool with the court. They can't say they are indisposed. Don't play fools with this court.
There was a direction, they had to be present here,” the bench said when counsel for the Arunachal Pradesh Government sought exemption from personal appearance of its Chief Secretary. Similar remarks were made by the court for the non-appearance of the Chief Secretaries of Gujarat and Tamil
Nadu.
The NGO in its PIL had alleged that over 1.7 lakh children had gone missing in the country between January 2008 and January 2010, many of whom were kidnapped for trafficking in flesh trade and child labour. Quoting statistics including from National Crime Research Bureau, the NGO had said that during that period, 1,17,480
children had gone missing in 392 districts in the country and out of these, 41,546 were yet to be traced.
The apex court disagreed with the reason of the Gujarat government that the Chief Secretary was recently appointed and, therefore, he could not appear before it. “Whether he had taken charge recently, doesn't matter. The order is passed by this court and you are required,” the bench said.
It also took exception to the plea seeking exemption from personal appearance of the Chief Secretary of Tamil Nadu. “We will issue non-bailable warrant next time,” it said. “What do you think? We pass orders just for the sake of passing orders?,” the court asked.
The bench rejected the plea for personal exemption of the Chief Secretaries of these states, saying, “Inspite of our January 17 order, the said three officials have once again thought it fit to treat the matter with extreme casualness as if the order passed by this court has no meaning.”
The judges made it clear that they have to appear personally and not through their representatives. “As far as other states are concerned, we are giving them
last opportunity to file their status report,” the court said. The bench also took exception to the submission by the West Bengal government counsel that the status report has not been filed as there was no instruction.
“Why don't you wake up from your slumber? Why are you appearing in the matter?,” the court said while also taking strong exception to the failure of the Delhi government to file the status report on the issue. It noted that the Union Territories which are governed by the Centre were the biggest defaulters.
The court also said that there were two counsel for the Centre, including Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A S Chandhiok, but there seemed to be no coordination.
“The left hand doesn't know what is there in the right hand,” it said, adding, “You are the biggest defaulters. You have no concern with children's issues. Who is the person responsible? Shall we call him.” The ASG said whatever he has to say he will place that on record.
The apex court concluded today's hearing by asking the ASG to file appropriate status reports on behalf of Ministries of Women and Child Welfare, Social Welfare and Home Affairs.
The court noted that not only the Centre but also the Governments of Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Uttrakhand, West Bengal and Union Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, NCT of Delhi and Lakhshadweep have not filed their status reports.
The court had on January 17 directed the states which had failed to file their response earlier, to do so by February 5 while stating that if they failed to do so, then their Chief Secretaries would have to appear before it.
The apex court had on March 16, last year issued notices to the Centre, the states, the UTs directing them to file their response on the issue of missing children.