In the latest development in the case related to the Adani-Hindenburg issue, the Supreme Court on Monday refused to take on record the suggestion of one of the petitioners and a report published by Forbes in a batch of PILs.
A bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala turned down the request by the lawyer appearing for one of the petitioners.
"No no we will not take it on record", the bench said. on the recent Adani Group shares crash triggered by the Hindenburg Research's fraud allegations.
Centre's suggestion also rejected
The apex court on February 17 had refused to accept in a sealed cover the Centre's suggestion on a proposed panel of experts for strengthening regulatory measures for the stock market.
SC calls for full transparency
Observing that it wants to maintain full transparency in the interests of investors, it said it would rather not accept the Centre's suggestion in a sealed cover.
"We will not accept the sealed cover suggestion by you because we want to maintain full transparency," the bench had said.
On February 10, the top court had said the interests of Indian investors need to be protected against market volatility in the backdrop of the Adani Group stock rout and asked the Centre to consider setting up a panel of domain experts headed by a former judge to look into strengthening the regulatory mechanism.
Till now, four PILs have been filed in the top court on the issue by lawyers M L Sharma and Vishal Tiwari, Congress leader Jaya Thakur and activist Mukesh Kumar.
Adani Group stocks have taken a beating on the bourses after Hindenburg Research made a litany of allegations, including fraudulent transactions and share-price manipulation, against the business conglomerate.
The Adani Group has dismissed the charges as lies, saying it complies with all laws and disclosure requirements.
(With PTI input)
Also Read: Who is George Soros - the US-based billionaire who invited BJP's wrath over PM Modi remark?
Latest India News
